SAAB 9-3 2000 vs Chrysler Sebring 2000
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 3.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 278 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 10 seconds | |
|
Chrysler Sebring is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-3 engine produces 53 HP less power than Chrysler Sebring, whereas torque is 38 NM less than Chrysler Sebring. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.2 | 10.1 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 10.1 l/100km | 10.0 l/100km | |
|
By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 15 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 620 km in combined cycle | 610 km in combined cycle | |
| 850 km on highway | 730 km on highway | ||
| 630 km with real consumption | 620 km with real consumption | ||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.64 m | 4.83 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.79 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.37 m | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is smaller, but higher. SAAB 9-3 is 19 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 8 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 8 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2000 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |