SAAB 9-3 1998 vs SAAB 9000 1995
Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 130 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 177 NM | 215 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13 seconds | 11 seconds | |
SAAB 9000 is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-3 engine produces 20 HP less power than SAAB 9000, whereas torque is 38 NM less than SAAB 9000. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.1 | 11.2 | |
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9000, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 68 litres | 66 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 670 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
910 km on highway | 830 km on highway | ||
SAAB 9-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.64 m | 4.76 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.78 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
SAAB 9-3 is smaller, but slightly higher. SAAB 9-3 is 12 cm shorter than the SAAB 9000, 7 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.9 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.4 metres less than that of the SAAB 9000, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`800 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | above average | no data | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 1000 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.7/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
SAAB 9000 has
| |