SAAB 9-3 2010 vs Volvo S60 2003

 
SAAB 9-3
2010 - 2011
Volvo S60
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP180 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 9.5 seconds8.8 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo S60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.49.2
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
1050 km on highway980 km on highway

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.58 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo S60, width is practically the same , while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
SAAB 9-3 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9702`010
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 44001600
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv