SAAB 9-3 2010 vs Volvo S60 2003

 
SAAB 9-3
2010 - 2011
Volvo S60
2003 - 2004
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 175 HP180 HP
Torque: 265 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 8.5 seconds8.8 seconds
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 5 HP less power than Volvo S60, but torque is 25 NM more than Volvo S60. Despite less power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 7.49.2
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 270 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 780 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
1070 km on highway980 km on highway
SAAB 9-3 2010 2.0 engine: The B207 engine is primarily installed in Saab vehicles, with its Opel equivalent being the Z20NET, used in the Vectra C. The engine features an aluminum alloy block with cast iron liners and a chain-driven timing system without variable valve timing. A distinctive feature is ...  More about SAAB 9-3 2010 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.58 m
Width: 1.80 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo S60, width is practically the same , while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
SAAB 9-3 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`9802`010
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 46001400
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
Volvo S60 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv