SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Volvo S60 2004

 
SAAB 9-3
2007 - 2010
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 210 HP180 HP
Torque: 300 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 seconds8.8 seconds
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.19.2
Real fuel consumption: 9.1 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
630 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.
SAAB 9-3 2007 2.0 engine: The Saab B207 engine is essentially identical to the Opel Z20NET and is based on a 2.2-liter naturally aspirated predecessor. It is a simple and reliable engine, even less demanding than its predecessor. However, it has some notable weaknesses. The timing and balance shaft chains have a limited lifespan and often stretch before reaching 200,000 km. The ...  More about SAAB 9-3 2007 2.0 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
SAAB 9-3 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6002`010
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

average
Average price (€): 30002600
Rating in user reviews: 9.5/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo S60 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv