SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Volvo S60 2004

 
SAAB 9-3
2007 - 2010
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 210 HP180 HP
Torque: 300 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.7 seconds8.8 seconds
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 30 HP more power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Volvo S60. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.19.2
Real fuel consumption: 9.1 l/100km10.1 l/100km
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 710 km in combined cycle760 km in combined cycle
630 km with real consumption690 km with real consumption
Volvo S60 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
SAAB 9-3 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6002`010
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

average
Average price (€): 40003200
Rating in user reviews: 9.5/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo S60 has
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv