SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Volvo S60 2004

 
SAAB 9-3
2007 - 2010
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 1.8 Petrol2.0 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP180 HP
Torque: 240 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds9.5 seconds
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo S60, the torque is the same for both cars. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 8.510.0
Real fuel consumption: 10.3 l/100km10.0 l/100km
By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel.
But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 680 km in combined cycle700 km in combined cycle
560 km with real consumption700 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.58 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.45 m1.43 m
SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
SAAB 9-3 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6002`030
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

average
Average price (€): 40003200
Rating in user reviews: 9.5/10 8.5/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo S60 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv