SAAB 9-3 2002 vs Alfa Romeo 159 2008

 
SAAB 9-3
2002 - 2007
Alfa Romeo 159
2008 - 2012
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.9 Petrol

Performance

Power: 150 HP160 HP
Torque: 240 NM190 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 10.7 seconds9.5 seconds
Alfa Romeo 159 is a more dynamic driving.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 10 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 159, but torque is 50 NM more than Alfa Romeo 159. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.48.7
The Alfa Romeo 159 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 159, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 105 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 62 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 650 km in combined cycle800 km in combined cycle
890 km on highway1060 km on highway
Alfa Romeo 159 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.66 m
Width: 1.76 m1.83 m
Height: 1.47 m1.42 m
SAAB 9-3 is smaller, but higher.
SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 159, 7 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 5 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data405 litres
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.1 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 159.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`985
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

low
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 159 has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 16004200
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Alfa Romeo 159 has
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv