SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Volvo V50 2007
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.8 Petrol | 2.5 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 255 HP | 230 HP | |
Torque: | 350 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.9 seconds | 6.9 seconds | |
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 25 HP more power than Volvo V50, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Volvo V50. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.4 | 8.7 | |
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 255 litres more fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 62 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 550 km in combined cycle | 710 km in combined cycle | |
Volvo V50 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.67 m | 4.52 m | |
Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
SAAB 9-3 is 15 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 1 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 417 litres | |
SAAB 9-3 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`000 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | above average | |
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V50 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 2800 | 3200 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 9.5/10 | 6.0/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |