SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Seat Exeo 2009
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 120 HP | |
| Torque: | 320 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.2 seconds | 10.9 seconds | |
| SAAB 9-3 engine produces 30 HP more power than Seat Exeo, whereas torque is 30 NM more than Seat Exeo. Despite the higher power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.7 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.6 l/100km | 6.2 l/100km | |
|
The Seat Exeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 150 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 860 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 870 km with real consumption | 1120 km with real consumption | ||
| Seat Exeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.67 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.43 m | |
| SAAB 9-3 and Seat Exeo are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 442 litres | |
|
Seat Exeo has more luggage space. SAAB 9-3 has 23 litres less trunk space than the Seat Exeo. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | no data | |
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 2`050 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | high | average | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 4400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Seat Exeo has
| |