SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Volvo V50 2007
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 122 HP | 125 HP | |
| Torque: | 167 NM | 165 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.5 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volvo V50 is a more dynamic driving. SAAB 9-3 engine produces 3 HP less power than Volvo V50, but torque is 2 NM more than Volvo V50. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 7.3 | |
|
The Volvo V50 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V50, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 75 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 58 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 740 km in combined cycle | 750 km in combined cycle | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.67 m | 4.52 m | |
| Width: | 1.76 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.50 m | 1.46 m | |
| SAAB 9-3 is 15 cm longer than the Volvo V50, 1 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 419 litres | 417 litres | |
| SAAB 9-3 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Volvo V50. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Volvo V50. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`400 | 1`890 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | above average | |
| SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V50 has serious deffects in 25 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
| Average price (€): | 2800 | 3200 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 9.5/10 | 6.0/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Volvo V50 has
| |