SAAB 9-3 2005 vs Volvo V70 2005

 
SAAB 9-3
2005 - 2007
Volvo V70
2005 - 2007
Gearbox: AutomaticManual
Engine: 2.8 Petrol2.4 Diesel
Petrol engines (SAAB 9-3) are generally quieter, smoother, and better suited for short trips due to quicker warm-up times. Diesel (Volvo V70) engines, on the other hand, offer superior fuel efficiency and torque, making them ideal for long-distance driving and heavy loads. Read more: Petrol vs. Diesel: Fuel Economy and Key Differences.
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 250 HP185 HP
Torque: 350 NM400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.8 seconds8.5 seconds
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 65 HP more power than Volvo V70, but torque is 50 NM less than Volvo V70. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 11.06.8
Real fuel consumption: 10.6 l/100km6.9 l/100km
The Volvo V70 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 4.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 630 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 3.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V70.
Fuel tank capacity: 58 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 520 km in combined cycle1020 km in combined cycle
540 km with real consumption1010 km with real consumption
Volvo V70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo V70 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 3 years5 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo XC90, Volvo XC70, Volvo XC60
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo V70 might be a better choice in this respect.
Volvo V70 2005 2.4 engine: The early versions of these engines are known for their reliability and rare failures, which made them popular. However, engine have several common weaknesses. Intake manifold swirl flaps often seize, and ...  More about Volvo V70 2005 2.4 engine 

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.71 m
Width: 1.76 m1.80 m
Height: 1.49 m1.49 m
SAAB 9-3 is smaller.
SAAB 9-3 is 6 cm shorter than the Volvo V70, 4 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 419 litres485 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1641 litres
Volvo V70 has more luggage space.
SAAB 9-3 has 66 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V70.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.9 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 1.1 metres less than that of the Volvo V70, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6002`160
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

below average
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo V70 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 18002400
Rating in user reviews: 8.5/10 8.1/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • more dynamic
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
Volvo V70 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
  • roomier boot
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv