SAAB 9-3 2000 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing chain | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 240 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| SAAB 9-3 2000 and SAAB 9-3 2002 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. SAAB 9-3 2000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.1 l/100km | 8.9 l/100km | |
|
The SAAB 9-3 2002 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9-3 2000 consumes 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3 2002, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 2000 could require 90 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 2000 consumes 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3 2002. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 64 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 710 km in combined cycle | 740 km in combined cycle | |
| 950 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| 700 km with real consumption | 690 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 350'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a SAAB 9-3 2002 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 11 years | 10 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on SAAB 9-5 | Used only for this car | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. SAAB 9-3 2000 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
|
SAAB 9-3 2000 is smaller. SAAB 9-3 2000 is 1 cm shorter than the SAAB 9-3 2002, 5 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 2000 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 2000 is 0.3 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-3 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | high | high | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |