SAAB 9-3 2010 vs Volvo C70 2009
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.9 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 160 HP | 136 HP | |
Torque: | 360 NM | 320 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-3 engine produces 24 HP more power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 40 NM more than Volvo C70. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 | 6.3 | |
SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 15 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 52 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 950 km in combined cycle | 820 km in combined cycle | |
950 km on highway | 980 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.65 m | 4.62 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.84 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
SAAB 9-3 is 3 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 6 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 200 litres | |
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage capacity. SAAB 9-3 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70. | |||
Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 11.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 1 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`130 | 2`130 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 4800 | 9600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |