SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Alfa Romeo 147 2005
Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
Power: | 175 HP | 150 HP | |
Torque: | 265 NM | 181 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9 seconds | 9.3 seconds | |
SAAB 9-3 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9-3 engine produces 25 HP more power than Alfa Romeo 147, whereas torque is 84 NM more than Alfa Romeo 147. Thanks to more power SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.5 | 8.9 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 9.0 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.4 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 147, which means that by driving the SAAB 9-3 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 60 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 147. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 59 litres | 60 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
890 km on highway | 850 km on highway | ||
650 km with real consumption | 650 km with real consumption | ||
Engines | |||
Average engine lifespan: | 400'000 km | 280'000 km | |
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a SAAB 9-3 engine could be longer. | |||
Engine production duration: | 10 years | 10 years | |
Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 4 other car models, including Alfa Romeo 156, Alfa Romeo 166, Alfa Romeo Spider | |
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Alfa Romeo 147 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.65 m | 4.22 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.73 m | |
Height: | 1.44 m | 1.42 m | |
SAAB 9-3 is larger. SAAB 9-3 is 43 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 147, 5 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 292 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1042 litres | |
Alfa Romeo 147 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, SAAB 9-3 has 57 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 147. This could mean that the SAAB 9-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 11.5 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.5 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 147, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 2`040 | 1`790 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | high | low | |
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems. According to annual technical inspection data Alfa Romeo 147 has serious deffects in 140 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better | |||
Average price (€): | 5400 | 1600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Alfa Romeo 147 has
| |