SAAB 9-3 1998 vs Mazda 626 1999

 
SAAB 9-3
1998 - 2000
Mazda 626
1999 - 2002
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.0 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 130 HP136 HP
Torque: 177 NM178 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 13 seconds12.5 seconds
Mazda 626 is a more dynamic driving.
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 6 HP less power than Mazda 626, whereas torque is 1 NM less than Mazda 626. Due to the lower power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 10.18.9
The Mazda 626 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 180 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres64 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 670 km in combined cycle710 km in combined cycle
910 km on highway900 km on highway

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 480'000 km480'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used.
Engine production duration: 6 years17 years
Engine spread: Installed on at least 2 other car models, including SAAB 9000, SAAB 900Used only for this car
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts.

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.59 m
Width: 1.71 m1.71 m
Height: 1.44 m1.43 m
Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-3 is 5 cm longer than the Mazda 626, width is practically the same , while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data502 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 626.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`500
Safety: no data
Quality:
high

above average
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Mazda 626 has serious deffects in 10 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably slightly better
Average price (€): 800800
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 6.2/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • fewer faults
  • higher ratings in user reviews
Mazda 626 has
  • timing belt engine
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv