SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Volvo C70 2006

 
SAAB 9-3
2007 - 2010
Volvo C70
2006 - 2009
Gearbox: AutomaticAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Petrol2.4 Petrol
Camshaft drive: Timing chainTiming belt
Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating.

Performance

Power: 150 HP140 HP
Torque: 240 NM220 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 12 seconds11.8 seconds
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 10 HP more power than Volvo C70, whereas torque is 20 NM more than Volvo C70. Despite the higher power, SAAB 9-3 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.2 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.79.6
SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 15 litres more fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 59 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 600 km in combined cycle640 km in combined cycle
Volvo C70 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Engines

Average engine lifespan: 420'000 km560'000 km
Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Volvo C70 engine could be longer.
Engine production duration: 10 years13 years
Engine spread: Used only for this carInstalled on at least 5 other car models, including Volvo V70, Volvo S80, Volvo S60, Volvo S40, Volvo V50, Volvo S70
In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Volvo C70 might be a better choice in this respect.

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.58 m
Width: 1.78 m1.82 m
Height: 1.44 m1.40 m
SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 4 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 235 litres200 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data404 litres
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage capacity.
SAAB 9-3 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70.
Turning diameter: 11 meters12.7 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0402`090
Safety: no datano data
Quality:
high

below average
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Volvo C70 has serious deffects in 85 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 54005600
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • timing chain engine
  • more power
  • roomier boot
  • better manoeuvrability
  • fewer faults
Volvo C70 has
  • timing belt engine
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • longer expected engine lifespan
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv