SAAB 9-3 1998 vs Ford Mondeo 1996

 
SAAB 9-3
1998 - 2000
Ford Mondeo
1996 - 2000
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Petrol1.8 Petrol

Performance

Power: 130 HP116 HP
Torque: 177 NM158 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds11 seconds
SAAB 9-3 engine produces 14 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 19 NM more than Ford Mondeo.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 9.18.0
Real fuel consumption: 9.1 l/100km8.4 l/100km
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification SAAB 9-3 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9-3 could require 165 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9-3 consumes 0.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo.
Fuel tank capacity: 68 litres62 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 740 km in combined cycle770 km in combined cycle
1000 km on highway1050 km on highway
740 km with real consumption730 km with real consumption

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.56 m
Width: 1.71 m1.75 m
Height: 1.43 m1.37 m
SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 4 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 6 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data460 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1290 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10.3 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.2 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo.
Gross weight (kg): 1`6001`790
Safety:
Quality:
high

low
SAAB 9-3 has fewer problems.
According to annual technical inspection data Ford Mondeo has serious deffects in 55 percent more cases than SAAB 9-3, so SAAB 9-3 quality is probably significantly better
Average price (€): 800600
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 8.3/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • more power
  • higher safety
  • fewer faults
Ford Mondeo has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv