SAAB 9-3 1998 vs BMW 3 series 2001

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
SAAB 9-3
1998 - 2002
BMW 3 series
2001 - 2005
Body: CoupeHatchback
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Rear wheel drive (RWD)
SAAB 9-3 is available with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive.
Engines: 2.0 - 2.31.8 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 115 - 225 HP115 - 192 HP
Torque: 177 - 342 NM175 - 330 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.8 - 13 seconds7.1 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 6.2 - 10.85.5 - 9.5
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.63 m4.26 m
Width: 1.71 m1.75 m
Height: 1.43 m1.41 m
SAAB 9-3 is 37 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: no data310 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1100 litres
Turning diameter: 10.5 meters10 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means SAAB 9-3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 1`600~ 1`874
Safety: no data
Quality:
above average

below average
Average price (€): 24002600
Rating in user reviews: 7.8/10 7.9/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • fewer faults
  • lower price
BMW 3 sērija has
  • lower fuel consumption
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv