SAAB 9-3 1998 vs BMW 3 series 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
Body: | Coupe | Hatchback | |
---|---|---|---|
Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
SAAB 9-3 is available with front wheel drive, while BMW 3 series can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 115 - 225 HP | 115 - 192 HP | |
Torque: | 177 - 342 NM | 175 - 330 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 13 seconds | 7.1 - 12 seconds | |
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 10.8 | 5.5 - 9.5 | |
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than BMW 3 series. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the BMW 3 series. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.63 m | 4.26 m | |
Width: | 1.71 m | 1.75 m | |
Height: | 1.43 m | 1.41 m | |
SAAB 9-3 is 37 cm longer than the BMW 3 series, 4 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 310 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1100 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.5 metres more than that of the BMW 3 series, which means SAAB 9-3 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`874 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | above average | below average | |
Average price (€): | 2400 | 2600 | |
Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.9/10 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
BMW 3 sērija has
| |