SAAB 9-3 2010 vs Volvo S60 2000

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
SAAB 9-3
2010 - 2011
Volvo S60
2000 - 2004
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Engines: 1.8 - 2.82.0 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 122 - 280 HP130 - 300 HP
Torque: 167 - 400 NM192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.1 - 11.5 seconds5.7 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 10.66.5 - 13.0
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.58 m
Width: 1.99 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.43 m
SAAB 9-3 is larger.
SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 19 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres424 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1034 litres
SAAB 9-3 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters13 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 2.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`020~ 2`030
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 44001400
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
Volvo S60 has
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv