SAAB 9-3 2010 vs Mazda 6 2008

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
SAAB 9-3
2010 - 2011
Mazda 6
2008 - 2010
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)Front wheel drive (FWD)
SAAB 9-3 is available with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive, while Mazda 6 can be equipped only with front wheel drive.
Engines: 1.8 - 2.81.8 - 2.5

Performance

Power: 122 - 280 HP120 - 185 HP
Torque: 167 - 400 NM165 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 6.1 - 11.5 seconds8.3 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.3 - 10.65.6 - 8.1
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 6. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.6 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 6.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.65 m4.76 m
Width: 1.99 m1.80 m
Height: 1.47 m1.44 m
SAAB 9-3 is 11 cm shorter than the Mazda 6, 20 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 3 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 425 litres510 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
no data1702 litres
Mazda 6 has more luggage space.
SAAB 9-3 has 85 litres less trunk space than the Mazda 6.
Turning diameter: 10.8 meters11.4 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Mazda 6, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`020~ 2`016
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
above average
Average price (€): 44003200
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • better manoeuvrability
Mazda 6 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • roomier boot
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv