SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Volvo S60 2004
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
SAAB 9-3
2007 - 2010
- choose version -
Saab 9-3 Sport Sedan 1.8i | 122 HP | Petrol | Manual
Saab 9-3 Sport Sedan 1.8t | 150 HP | Petrol | Manual
Saab 9-3 Sport Sedan 1.8t | 150 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Saab 9-3 Sport Sedan 1.8t | 175 HP | Diesel | Manual
Saab 9-3 Sport Sedan 1.8t | 175 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Sport Sedan 1.9 TiD | 120 HP | Diesel | Manual
Sport Sedan 1.9 TiD | 150 HP | Diesel | Manual
Sport Sedan 1.9 TiD | 150 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Sport Sedan 2.0 Turbo Aero | 210 HP | Petrol | Manual
Sport Sedan 2.0 Turbo Aero | 210 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Sport Sedan 2.0t | 175 HP | Petrol | Manual
Sport Sedan 2.0t | 175 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Sport Sedan 2.0t BioPower | 200 HP | Diesel | Manual
Sport Sedan 2.0t BioPower | 200 HP | Diesel | Automatic
Sport Sedan 2.8 Turbo V6 Aero | 255 HP | Petrol | Manual
Sport Sedan 2.8 Turbo V6 Aero | 255 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S60
2004 - 2009
- choose version -
Volvo S60 2.0 T Automatic | 180 HP | Petrol | Automatic
Volvo S60 2.0 T | 180 HP | Petrol | Manual
Volvo S60 2.4 140 Hp | 140 HP | Petrol | Manual
2.4 140 Hp Automatic | 140 HP | Petrol | Automatic
2.4 170 Hp Automatic | 170 HP | Petrol | Automatic
2.4 170 Hp | 170 HP | Petrol | Manual
2.4 Bi-Fuel CNG Automatic | 140 HP | Petrol | Automatic
2.4 Bi-Fuel CNG | 140 HP | Petrol | Manual
2.4 Bi-Fuel LPG Automatic | 140 HP | Petrol | Automatic
2.4 Bi-Fuel LPG | 140 HP | Petrol | Manual
2.4 D Automatic | 130 HP | Diesel | Automatic
2.4 D | 130 HP | Diesel | Manual
2.4 D5 Automatic | 163 HP | Diesel | Automatic
2.4 D5 | 163 HP | Diesel | Manual
2.4D | 163 HP | Diesel | Manual
2.4D Automatic | 163 HP | Diesel | Automatic
2.5 T Automatic | 210 HP | Petrol | Automatic
2.5 T | 210 HP | Petrol | Manual
2.5T AWD | 210 HP | Petrol | Manual | 4x4
2.5T AWD Automatic | 210 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
D | 126 HP | Diesel | Manual
D5 | 185 HP | Diesel | Manual
D5 Automatic | 185 HP | Diesel | Automatic
R Automatic | 300 HP | Petrol | Automatic | 4x4
R | 300 HP | Petrol | Manual | 4x4
T5 Automatic | 260 HP | Petrol | Automatic
T5 | 260 HP | Petrol | Manual
2.4i T5 20V Automatic | 260 HP | Petrol | Automatic
2.4i T5 20V | 260 HP | Petrol | Manual
Gearbox:
Manual/Automatic Manual/Automatic
Wheel drive type:
Front wheel drive (FWD) Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
SAAB 9-3 is available only with front wheel drive, while Volvo S60 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines:
1.8 - 2.8 2.0 - 2.5
Performance
Power:
120 - 255 HP 126 - 300 HP
Torque:
167 - 350 NM 192 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h:
6.7 - 11.5 seconds 5.7 - 12 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!
Fuel consumption
Fuel consumption (l/100km):
5.4 - 10.8 6.4 - 13.0
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than Volvo S60. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version !
Dimensions
Length:
4.65 m 4.59 m
Width:
1.76 m 1.80 m
Height:
1.45 m 1.43 m
SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 4 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm higher.
Trunk capacity:
425 litres 424 litres
Trunk max capacity:with rear seats folded down
no data 1034 litres
SAAB 9-3 has 1 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60.
Turning diameter:
10.8 meters 13 meters
The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 2.2 metres less than that of the Volvo S60, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg):
~ 1`581 ~ 2`031
Safety:
no data no data
Quality:
high
average
Average price (€):
2800 2800
Rating in user reviews:
9.5 /10
8.5 /10
Pros and Cons:
SAAB 9-3 has
lower fuel consumption for petrol engines better manoeuvrability fewer faults higher ratings in user reviews
Volvo S60 has
available with 4x4 drive lower fuel consumption for diesel engines
Share these results to social networks or e-mail