SAAB 9-3 1998 vs SAAB 9-3 2002
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Hatchback | Sedan | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 225 HP | 120 - 210 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 - 342 NM | 167 - 320 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 13 seconds | 7.5 - 11.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 10.8 | 5.8 - 9.5 | |
|
SAAB 9-3 1998 petrol engines consumes on average 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than SAAB 9-3 2002. On average, SAAB 9-3 1998 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3 2002. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
|
SAAB 9-3 1998 is smaller. SAAB 9-3 1998 and SAAB 9-3 2002 are practically the same length. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 1998 is 0.3 metres less than that of the SAAB 9-3 2002. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`577 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 1600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 7.8/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |