SAAB 9-3 1998 vs Mazda 626 1999
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 1.8 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 115 - 225 HP | 100 - 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 - 342 NM | 152 - 230 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 6.8 - 13 seconds | 9.6 - 12.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 6.2 - 10.8 | 5.9 - 8.9 | |
|
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Mazda 626. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mazda 626. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.59 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.71 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm longer than the Mazda 626, width is practically the same also the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 502 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.5 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Mazda 626. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`600 | ~ 1`671 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | above average | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 800 | 800 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.8/10 | 6.2/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Mazda 626 has
| |