SAAB 9-3 2010 vs Volvo V40 2016
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Body: | Cabrio | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.0 | 1.5 - 2.0 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 160 - 210 HP | 120 - 245 HP | |
| Torque: | 265 - 400 NM | 220 - 400 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8 - 10.7 seconds | 6.3 - 10.5 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.2 - 10.0 | 3.4 - 5.9 | |
|
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 3.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo V40. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 2.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Volvo V40. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.37 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.44 m | |
| SAAB 9-3 is 28 cm longer than the Volvo V40, 2 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 335 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1500 litres | |
|
Volvo V40 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, SAAB 9-3 has 100 litres less trunk space than the Volvo V40. This could mean that the SAAB 9-3 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10.8 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`094 | ~ 1`978 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 5000 | 11 400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Volvo V40 has
| |