SAAB 9-3 2007 vs Volvo C70 2006
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 1.9 - 2.8 | 2.0 - 2.5 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 - 255 HP | 136 - 230 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 - 400 NM | 220 - 350 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.2 - 12 seconds | 7.6 - 11.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 - 11.0 | 6.1 - 9.8 | |
|
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.2 litres more fuel per 100 km than Volvo C70. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo C70. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.65 m | 4.58 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
| Height: | 1.44 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. SAAB 9-3 is 7 cm longer than the Volvo C70, 2 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 235 litres | 200 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 404 litres | |
|
SAAB 9-3 has more luggage capacity. SAAB 9-3 has 35 litres more trunk space than the Volvo C70. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11 meters | 12.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 1.7 metres less than that of the Volvo C70, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 2`058 | ~ 2`064 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | high | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 5400 | 5000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Volvo C70 has
| |