SAAB 9-3 2003 vs Alfa Romeo 159 2006

Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison

 
SAAB 9-3
2003 - 2007
Alfa Romeo 159
2006 - 2008
Body: CabrioEstate car / wagon
Gearbox: Manual/AutomaticManual/Automatic
Wheel drive type: Front wheel drive (FWD)Front wheel drive (FWD) / All wheel drive (AWD, 4x4)
SAAB 9-3 is available only with front wheel drive, while Alfa Romeo 159 can be equipped with front wheel drive and four wheel (4x4) drive.
Engines: 1.9 - 2.81.9 - 3.2

Performance

Power: 150 - 250 HP120 - 260 HP
Torque: 240 - 350 NM190 - 400 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 7.1 - 12 seconds7.2 - 11 seconds
Select a car version for a more accurate comparison!

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.9 - 11.06.0 - 12.3
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than Alfa Romeo 159. On average, SAAB 9-3 equipped with diesel engines consume 0.8 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 159.
This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version!

Dimensions

Length: 4.64 m4.66 m
Width: 1.76 m1.83 m
Height: 1.43 m1.42 m
SAAB 9-3 is smaller, but slightly higher.
SAAB 9-3 is 2 cm shorter than the Alfa Romeo 159, 7 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 1 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 235 litres445 litres
Alfa Romeo 159 has more luggage space.
SAAB 9-3 has 210 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 159.
Turning diameter: 11 meters11 meters
Gross weight (kg): ~ 2`061~ 2`163
Safety:
Quality:
above average

low
Average price (€): 70003800
Rating in user reviews: 7.6/10 9.0/10
Pros and Cons: SAAB 9-3 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • fewer faults
Alfa Romeo 159 has
  • available with 4x4 drive
  • roomier boot
  • higher ratings in user reviews
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv