SAAB 9-3 1998 vs Chrysler Sebring 2001
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 2.0 - 2.7 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 225 HP | 141 - 203 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 - 342 NM | 188 - 262 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 - 13 seconds | 11.4 - 12.3 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 11.0 | 10.2 - 10.6 | |
|
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chrysler Sebring. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.92 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is smaller, but slightly higher. SAAB 9-3 is 29 cm shorter than the Chrysler Sebring, 5 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | 320 litres | |
|
Chrysler Sebring has more luggage space. SAAB 9-3 has 25 litres less trunk space than the Chrysler Sebring. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 1 metres less than that of the Chrysler Sebring, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`823 | ~ 1`990 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
Chrysler Sebring has
| |