SAAB 9-3 1998 vs Chevrolet Camaro 1998
Select specific versions of each model (by engine capacity, power, drivetrain and gearbox) for an accurate comparison
| Gearbox: | Manual/Automatic | Manual/Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
| SAAB 9-3 is available with front wheel drive, while Chevrolet Camaro can be equipped with rear wheel drive. | |||
| Engines: | 2.0 - 2.3 | 3.8 | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 130 - 225 HP | 193 HP | |
| Torque: | 177 - 342 NM | 305 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 7.1 - 13 seconds | 8.5 - 8.8 seconds | |
| Select a car version for a more accurate comparison! | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.8 - 11.0 | 11.7 - 12.4 | |
|
SAAB 9-3 petrol engines consumes on average 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than Chevrolet Camaro. This comparison does not take engine capacity into account, so to compare the fuel consumption of specific engines, select the car version! | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.63 m | 4.91 m | |
| Width: | 1.71 m | 1.88 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.30 m | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is smaller, but higher. SAAB 9-3 is 28 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Camaro, 17 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9-3 is 13 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 295 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 10 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9-3 is 1.6 metres less than that of the Chevrolet Camaro, which means SAAB 9-3 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | ~ 1`823 | no data | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | above average | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 2400 | 3000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9-3 has
|
| |