SAAB 9000 1994 vs Ford Scorpio 1996
Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 170 HP | 147 HP | |
Torque: | 260 NM | 202 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 11.2 seconds | |
SAAB 9000 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9000 engine produces 23 HP more power than Ford Scorpio, whereas torque is 58 NM more than Ford Scorpio. Thanks to more power SAAB 9000 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.7 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.6 | 10.5 | |
The SAAB 9000 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9000 consumes 0.9 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Ford Scorpio, which means that by driving the SAAB 9000 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 135 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 680 km in combined cycle | 660 km in combined cycle | |
900 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
Drive type | |||
Wheel drive type: | Front wheel drive (FWD) | Rear wheel drive (RWD) | |
Front-wheel drive cars (SAAB 9000) have better traction on slippery roads and when climbing hills, better fuel economy, and are less expensive to purchase. On the disadvantage side, FWD cars usually have less towing capacity, poorer acceleration and harder handling. Rear-wheel drive cars (Ford Scorpio) have better handling on dry roads, better acceleration, more even weight distribution and more fun to drive. RWD is also better for towing large loads. The cons of rear-wheel drive are less interior and trunk space and more difficulty maneuvering in wet and snowy conditions. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.82 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.88 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.39 m | |
SAAB 9000 is smaller, but slightly higher. SAAB 9000 is 3 cm shorter than the Ford Scorpio, 10 cm narrower, while the height of SAAB 9000 is 3 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | no data | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.4 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9000 is 0.5 metres more than that of the Ford Scorpio, which means SAAB 9000 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`850 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | below average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9000 has
|
Ford Scorpio has
| |