SAAB 9000 1995 vs Chrysler Neon 1997
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 133 HP | |
Torque: | 215 NM | 174 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 9.2 seconds | |
SAAB 9000 engine produces 17 HP more power than Chrysler Neon, whereas torque is 41 NM more than Chrysler Neon. Despite the higher power, SAAB 9000 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.2 | 8.5 | |
Real fuel consumption: | 10.7 l/100km | 9.2 l/100km | |
The Chrysler Neon is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9000 consumes 2.7 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9000 could require 405 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9000 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chrysler Neon. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 47 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 580 km in combined cycle | 550 km in combined cycle | |
830 km on highway | 710 km on highway | ||
610 km with real consumption | 510 km with real consumption | ||
SAAB 9000 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.79 m | 4.36 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.71 m | |
Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
SAAB 9000 is larger. SAAB 9000 is 43 cm longer than the Chrysler Neon, 7 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9000 is 5 cm higher. | |||
Trunk capacity: | no data | 364 litres | |
Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.8 meters | |
The turning circle of the SAAB 9000 is 0.1 metres more than that of the Chrysler Neon. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | 1`600 | 1`600 | |
Safety: | no data | no data | |
Quality: | no data | no data | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 600 | |
Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9000 has
|
Chrysler Neon has
| |