SAAB 9000 1991 vs Mitsubishi Colt 1996
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.3 Petrol | 1.3 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing chain | Timing belt | |
| Engine chain usually needs to be replaced less often than the timing belt, but the cost of replacing the chain is usually higher. Chain motors are considered to be more reliable, but noisier and more vibration generating. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 200 HP | 75 HP | |
| Torque: | 294 NM | 108 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 8.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9000 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9000 engine produces 125 HP more power than Mitsubishi Colt, whereas torque is 186 NM more than Mitsubishi Colt. Thanks to more power SAAB 9000 reaches 100 km/h speed 4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 11.7 | 6.9 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 11.4 l/100km | 7.1 l/100km | |
|
The Mitsubishi Colt is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification SAAB 9000 consumes 4.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9000 could require 720 litres more fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, SAAB 9000 consumes 4.3 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Mitsubishi Colt. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 50 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 560 km in combined cycle | 720 km in combined cycle | |
| 800 km on highway | 900 km on highway | ||
| 570 km with real consumption | 700 km with real consumption | ||
| Mitsubishi Colt gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 420'000 km | 280'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a SAAB 9000 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 4 years | 27 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Used also on Mitsubishi Lancer | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Mitsubishi Colt might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The SAAB 9000 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 3.88 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.68 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.36 m | |
|
SAAB 9000 is larger. SAAB 9000 is 88 cm longer than the Mitsubishi Colt, 10 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9000 is 6 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 240 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 830 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9000 is 0.9 metres more than that of the Mitsubishi Colt, which means SAAB 9000 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`445 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9000 has
|
Mitsubishi Colt has
| |