SAAB 9000 1995 vs Ford Mondeo 1996
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 176 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9000 is more dynamic to drive. SAAB 9000 engine produces 19 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, whereas torque is 39 NM more than Ford Mondeo. Thanks to more power SAAB 9000 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.9 | 8.1 | |
|
The Ford Mondeo is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. SAAB 9000 consumes 1.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the SAAB 9000 could require 270 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 66 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 660 km in combined cycle | 760 km in combined cycle | |
| 840 km on highway | 1010 km on highway | ||
| Ford Mondeo gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.76 m | 4.56 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.75 m | |
| Height: | 1.42 m | 1.37 m | |
|
SAAB 9000 is larger. SAAB 9000 is 20 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm wider, while the height of SAAB 9000 is 5 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | no data | 460 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
no data | 1290 litres | |
| Turning diameter: | 10.9 meters | 10.3 meters | |
| The turning circle of the SAAB 9000 is 0.6 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo, which means SAAB 9000 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 1`800 | 1`820 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | below average | |
| Average price (€): | 1000 | 600 | |
| Rating in user reviews: | 7.7/10 | 8.3/10 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
SAAB 9000 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |