Rover 75 2004 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.5 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 177 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 240 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 9.5 seconds | 12.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 46 HP more power than Chevrolet Evanda, whereas torque is 59 NM more than Chevrolet Evanda. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 10.5 | 9.6 | |
| Rover 75 consumes 0.9 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 135 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 610 km in combined cycle | 670 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 840 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Evanda, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |