Rover 75 2004 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Rover 75) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Chevrolet Evanda) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 131 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 300 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
| Rover 75 and Chevrolet Evanda have the same engine power, but Rover 75 torque is 119 NM more than Chevrolet Evanda. Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.8 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 450 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1470 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Evanda, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |