Rover 75 2004 vs Ford Mondeo 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.0 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 115 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 280 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.8 seconds | |
|
Ford Mondeo is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 1 HP more power than Ford Mondeo, but torque is 20 NM less than Ford Mondeo. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
| Rover 75 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Ford Mondeo, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 15 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 56 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.73 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
| Rover 75 is 2 cm longer than the Ford Mondeo, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
|
Ford Mondeo has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 68 litres less trunk space than the Ford Mondeo. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.1 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres more than that of the Ford Mondeo. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`100 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Ford Mondeo has
| |