Rover 75 2004 vs Audi A6 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 180 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 370 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 8.9 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 64 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 8.1 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 2.3 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 345 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 860 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1120 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.45 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 5 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 6 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Rover 75 has 119 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`145 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Audi A6 has
| |