Rover 75 2004 vs Volvo S60 2003
Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
---|---|---|---|
Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
Power: | 150 HP | 180 HP | |
Torque: | 215 NM | 240 NM | |
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
Volvo S60 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 30 HP less power than Volvo S60, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Volvo S60. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.5 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 10.0 | |
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 1.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S60, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 165 litres of fuel. | |||
Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 700 km in combined cycle | |
980 km on highway | 920 km on highway | ||
Dimensions | |||
Length: | 4.75 m | 4.58 m | |
Width: | 1.78 m | 1.80 m | |
Height: | 1.39 m | 1.43 m | |
Rover 75 is 17 cm longer than the Volvo S60, 2 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm lower. | |||
Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 424 litres | |
Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | 1034 litres | |
Rover 75 has 8 litres more trunk space than the Volvo S60. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S60 (by 602 litres). | |||
Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S60, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`030 | |
Safety: | no data | ||
Quality: | no data | above average | |
Average price (€): | 1400 | 1400 | |
Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Volvo S60 has
| |