Rover 75 2004 vs Chevrolet Evanda 2005
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 131 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 181 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.6 seconds | 10.7 seconds | |
|
Chevrolet Evanda is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 11 HP less power than Chevrolet Evanda, whereas torque is 21 NM less than Chevrolet Evanda. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.9 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 7.8 | 8.8 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Chevrolet Evanda, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 150 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 65 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 830 km in combined cycle | 730 km in combined cycle | |
| 1060 km on highway | 950 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.77 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.39 m | 1.44 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 2 cm shorter than the Chevrolet Evanda, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1 metres more than that of the Chevrolet Evanda, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`500 | |
| Safety: | no data | no data | |
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1400 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Chevrolet Evanda has
| |