Rover 75 1999 vs Audi A6 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain and belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 195 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 20 HP more power than Audi A6, but torque is 10 NM less than Audi A6. Thanks to more power Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 8.3 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 9.9 l/100km | 10.6 l/100km | |
|
By specification Rover 75 consumes 1.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 165 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 75 consumes 0.7 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 840 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 1090 km on highway | ||
| 650 km with real consumption | 660 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 420'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Audi A6 engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 8 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used also on Rover 45 | Installed on at least 2 other car models, including Volkswagen Passat, Audi A4 | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Audi A6 might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 is 5 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Rover 75 has 119 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`945 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Audi A6 has
| |