Rover 75 1999 vs Rover 45 2002
| Body: | Sedan | Hatchback | |
|---|---|---|---|
| The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area. | |||
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing belt | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 150 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 185 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
| Rover 75 and Rover 45 have the same engine power, the torque is the same for both cars. Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 9.4 | |
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 55 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 580 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 820 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 330'000 km | 330'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 6 years | 6 years | |
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.36 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.70 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.39 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger. Rover 75 is 39 cm longer than the Rover 45, 8 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 380 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
432 litres | 717 litres | |
| Rover 75 has 52 litres more trunk space than the Rover 45. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 45 (by 285 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.4 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1 metres more than that of the Rover 45, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`000 kg | 1`720 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`445 kg | 1`340 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 555 kg | 380 kg | |
| Rover 75 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 32 procentiem more than Rover 45. Therefore, Rover 75 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Rover 45 has
| |