Rover 75 1999 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Petrol | 2.3 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 185 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.2 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 64 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 110 NM less than Mazda Xedos 9. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 10.0 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 920 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 9, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
| Rover 75 has 2 litres more trunk space than the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`985 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |