Rover 75 2003 vs Rover 45 1999

 
Rover 75
2003 - 2004
Rover 45
1999 - 2004
Body: SedanHatchback
The hatchback generally has more luggage space thanks to a larger trunk door opening and the ability to convert the rear of the passenger compartment into luggage space. Sedans tend to be quieter than hatchbacks, due to a more isolated rear area.
Gearbox: ManualManual
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.0 Diesel

Performance

Power: 131 HP100 HP
Torque: 300 NM240 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11 seconds10.6 seconds
Rover 75 engine produces 31 HP more power than Rover 45, whereas torque is 60 NM more than Rover 45. Despite the higher power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.4 seconds later.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.85.4
Real fuel consumption: 6.8 l/100km6.0 l/100km
The Rover 45 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.4 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 45, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 60 litres more fuel.
By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.8 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Rover 45.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres55 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle1010 km in combined cycle
1470 km on highway1270 km on highway
950 km with real consumption910 km with real consumption
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.36 m
Width: 1.78 m1.70 m
Height: 1.43 m1.39 m
Rover 75 is larger.
Rover 75 is 39 cm longer than the Rover 45, 8 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm higher.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres380 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litres717 litres
Rover 75 has 52 litres more trunk space than the Rover 45. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Rover 45 (by 285 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters10.4 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 1 metres more than that of the Rover 45, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`0301`720
Safety: no data
Quality: no datano data
Average price (€): 1800800
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • more power
  • more full fuel tank mileage
  • roomier boot
Rover 45 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • better manoeuvrability
  • lower price
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv