Rover 75 1999 vs Volvo S80 2003

 
Rover 75
1999 - 2004
Volvo S80
2003 - 2005
Gearbox: ManualAutomatic
Engine: 2.0 Diesel2.4 Diesel

Performance

Power: 116 HP130 HP
Torque: 260 NM280 NM
Acceleration 0-100 km/h: 11.7 seconds12 seconds
Rover 75 engine produces 14 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 20 NM less than Volvo S80. Despite less power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.3 seconds faster.

Fuel consumption

Fuel consumption (l/100km): 5.87.8
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy.
Rover 75 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel.
Fuel tank capacity: 65 litres70 litres
Full fuel tank distance: 1120 km in combined cycle890 km in combined cycle
1380 km on highway1140 km on highway
Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank.
Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy.

Dimensions

Length: 4.75 m4.82 m
Width: 1.78 m1.83 m
Height: 1.43 m1.43 m
Rover 75 is smaller.
Rover 75 is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly.
Trunk capacity: 432 litres440 litres
Trunk max capacity:
with rear seats folded down
432 litres1106 litres
Rover 75 has 8 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S80 (by 674 litres).
Turning diameter: 11.4 meters11 meters
The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces.
Gross weight (kg): 2`030no data
Safety: no data
Quality: no data
below average
Average price (€): 16001600
Pros and Cons: Rover 75 has
  • lower fuel consumption
  • more full fuel tank mileage
Volvo S80 has
  • more power
Share these results to social networks or e-mail
Contact us: info@auto-abc.lv