Rover 75 1999 vs Volvo S80 1999
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.5 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 140 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 290 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 24 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 30 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 6.4 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.4 l/100km | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.6 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 90 litres of fuel. By comparing actual fuel consumption based on user reports, Rover 75 consumes 0.1 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 80 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1250 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1630 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1250 km with real consumption | ||
| Volvo S80 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | 1106 litres | |
| Rover 75 has 8 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S80 (by 674 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`140 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |