Rover 75 1999 vs Volvo S80 2002
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 340 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 11 seconds | |
|
Volvo S80 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 47 HP less power than Volvo S80, whereas torque is 80 NM less than Volvo S80. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 0.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.8 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Volvo S80, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 300 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 890 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1140 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Volvo S80 2002 2.4 engine: These diesel engines are frequently affected by intake manifold swirl flap seizures. This issue often leads to airflow disruptions and rough engine operation.
The actuator for the turbocharger, which relies ... More about Volvo S80 2002 2.4 engine | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.43 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 7 cm shorter than the Volvo S80, 5 cm narrower the height of the cars does not differ significantly. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 440 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | 1106 litres | |
| Rover 75 has 8 litres less trunk space than the Volvo S80. The maximum boot capacity (with all rear seats folded down) is larger in Volvo S80 (by 674 litres). | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.4 metres more than that of the Volvo S80, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`070 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1200 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Volvo S80 has
| |