Rover 75 1999 vs Audi A6 2001
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 1.9 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 130 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 285 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 10.5 seconds | |
|
Audi A6 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 14 HP less power than Audi A6, whereas torque is 25 NM less than Audi A6. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 5.7 | |
| Real fuel consumption: | 6.3 l/100km | 6.5 l/100km | |
|
By specification Rover 75 consumes 0.1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 15 litres more fuel. But when we compare the real fuel consumption reported by users, Rover 75 consumes 0.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Audi A6. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 1220 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1520 km on highway | ||
| 1030 km with real consumption | 1070 km with real consumption | ||
| Audi A6 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.81 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.45 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 is 5 cm shorter than the Audi A6, 3 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 2 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 551 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
|
Audi A6 has more luggage space. Rover 75 has 119 litres less trunk space than the Audi A6. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.7 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.3 metres less than that of the Audi A6. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
Audi A6 has
| |