Rover 75 1999 vs Mazda Xedos 9 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.3 Petrol | |
| Diesel (Rover 75) engines typically outperform gasoline engines in terms of fuel efficiency and low-end torque. This makes them more economical and better suited for towing or long-distance travel. However, gasoline (Mazda Xedos 9) engines mostly are lighter, quieter, and offer better acceleration and responsiveness, especially in smaller vehicles. For more information, see the article "Diesel or Petrol: Fuel Economy and Key Differences." | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 214 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 295 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.5 seconds | |
|
Mazda Xedos 9 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 98 HP less power than Mazda Xedos 9, whereas torque is 35 NM less than Mazda Xedos 9. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 2.2 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 10.0 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 4.2 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Mazda Xedos 9, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 630 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 68 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 680 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 880 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.82 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.77 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.40 m | |
| Both cars are similar in size. Rover 75 is 7 cm shorter than the Mazda Xedos 9, 1 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 3 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 430 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down, if possible |
432 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.5 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.1 metres less than that of the Mazda Xedos 9. | |||
| Gross weight: | 2`030 kg | 1`985 kg | |
| Net weight: | 1`485 kg | 1`500 kg | |
| Load capacity: | 545 kg | 485 kg | |
| Rover 75 load capacity (permitted cargo and passenger weight) is par apmēram 11 procentiem more than Mazda Xedos 9. Therefore, Rover 75 is more suitable for longer family trips or transporting heavier loads. | |||
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1600 | 800 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Mazda Xedos 9 has
| |