Rover 75 1999 vs Alfa Romeo 166 1998
| Gearbox: | Manual | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 2.0 Diesel | 2.4 Diesel | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 116 HP | 136 HP | |
| Torque: | 260 NM | 304 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 11.7 seconds | 9.9 seconds | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 20 HP less power than Alfa Romeo 166, whereas torque is 44 NM less than Alfa Romeo 166. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.8 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 5.8 | 7.3 | |
|
The Rover 75 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 1.5 litres less fuel per 100 km than the Alfa Romeo 166, which means that by driving the Rover 75 over 15,000 km in a year you can save 225 litres of fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 72 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 1120 km in combined cycle | 980 km in combined cycle | |
| 1380 km on highway | 1260 km on highway | ||
| Rover 75 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.72 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.82 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.42 m | |
| Rover 75 is 3 cm longer than the Alfa Romeo 166, 4 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 1 cm higher. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 500 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has more luggage space. Despite its longer length, Rover 75 has 68 litres less trunk space than the Alfa Romeo 166. This could mean that the Rover 75 uses more space in the cabin, so the driver and passengers could be more spacious and comfortable. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 11.6 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.2 metres less than that of the Alfa Romeo 166. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`030 | 2`000 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1400 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Alfa Romeo 166 has
| |