Rover 75 2002 vs Hyundai Sonata 2008
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Automatic | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 2.0 Petrol | |
| Camshaft drive: | Timing belt | Timing chain | |
| Timing belt usually needs to be replaced more often than the chain, but it is usually significantly cheaper. Timing belt motors are generally quieter and less vibrating than chain motors. | |||
Performance | |||
| Power: | 150 HP | 163 HP | |
| Torque: | 215 NM | 197 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 10.4 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
Rover 75 is more dynamic to drive. Rover 75 engine produces 13 HP less power than Hyundai Sonata, but torque is 18 NM more than Hyundai Sonata. Despite less power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.1 seconds faster. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 8.9 | 7.9 | |
|
The Hyundai Sonata is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 1 litres more fuel per 100 km than the Hyundai Sonata, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 150 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 70 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 730 km in combined cycle | 880 km in combined cycle | |
| 980 km on highway | 1040 km on highway | ||
| Hyundai Sonata gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
| Read the article "Fuel Efficiency: How to Reduce Fuel Consumption" to learn more about fuel economy. | |||
Engines | |||
| Average engine lifespan: | 300'000 km | 390'000 km | |
| Engine resource depends largely on regular maintenance and the quality of the oils and fuels used, but under equal conditions the average life of a Hyundai Sonata engine could be longer. | |||
| Engine production duration: | 3 years | 6 years | |
| Engine spread: | Used only for this car | Installed on at least 5 other car models, including Kia Sportage, Hyundai ix35, Kia Optima, Kia Cerato | |
| In general, the longer and for more car models an engine is produced, the better its serviceability and availability of spare parts. Hyundai Sonata might be a better choice in this respect. | |||
| Hydraulic tappets: | yes | no | |
| The Rover 75 engine has hydraulic tappets (lifters), providing quieter operation and no need for periodic adjustment, but they are more complex in design and can cause serious engine damage in case of failure. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.80 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.83 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.48 m | |
|
Rover 75 is smaller. Rover 75 is 5 cm shorter than the Hyundai Sonata, 5 cm narrower, while the height of Rover 75 is 5 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | 523 litres | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
|
Hyundai Sonata has more luggage space. Rover 75 has 91 litres less trunk space than the Hyundai Sonata. | |||
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 12 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.6 metres less than that of the Hyundai Sonata, which means Rover 75 can be easier to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | no data | 2`030 | |
| Safety: | no data | ||
| Quality: | no data | no data | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 2000 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
Rover 75 has
|
Hyundai Sonata has
| |