Rover 75 1999 vs SAAB 9-3 2003
| Gearbox: | Automatic | Manual | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Engine: | 1.8 Petrol | 1.8 Petrol | |
Performance | |||
| Power: | 120 HP | 122 HP | |
| Torque: | 160 NM | 167 NM | |
| Acceleration 0-100 km/h: | 13.2 seconds | 11.5 seconds | |
|
SAAB 9-3 is a more dynamic driving. Rover 75 engine produces 2 HP less power than SAAB 9-3, whereas torque is 7 NM less than SAAB 9-3. Due to the lower power, Rover 75 reaches 100 km/h speed 1.7 seconds later. | |||
Fuel consumption | |||
| Fuel consumption (l/100km): | 9.4 | 7.9 | |
|
The SAAB 9-3 is a better choice when it comes to fuel economy. Rover 75 consumes 1.5 litres more fuel per 100 km than the SAAB 9-3, which means that if you drive 15,000 km in a year, the Rover 75 could require 225 litres more fuel. | |||
| Fuel tank capacity: | 65 litres | 62 litres | |
| Full fuel tank distance: | 690 km in combined cycle | 780 km in combined cycle | |
| 860 km on highway | 1000 km on highway | ||
| SAAB 9-3 gets more mileage on one fuel tank. | |||
Dimensions | |||
| Length: | 4.75 m | 4.64 m | |
| Width: | 1.78 m | 1.76 m | |
| Height: | 1.43 m | 1.47 m | |
|
Rover 75 is larger, but slightly lower. Rover 75 is 11 cm longer than the SAAB 9-3, 2 cm wider, while the height of Rover 75 is 4 cm lower. | |||
| Trunk capacity: | 432 litres | no data | |
| Trunk max capacity: with rear seats folded down |
432 litres | no data | |
| Turning diameter: | 11.4 meters | 10.8 meters | |
| The turning circle of the Rover 75 is 0.6 metres more than that of the SAAB 9-3, which means Rover 75 can be harder to manoeuvre in tight streets and parking spaces. | |||
| Gross weight (kg): | 2`000 | 1`400 | |
| Safety: | |||
| Quality: | no data | above average | |
| Average price (€): | 1800 | 1600 | |
| Pros and Cons: |
|
SAAB 9-3 has
| |